A new documentary entitled Last
Will and Embezzlement
that is slated for release tackles senior financial exploitation. The film will touch on all aspects of the problem
with the ultimate goal of raising awareness of the problem to ultimately lower
the incidence of mistreatment.
The centerpiece of the film is an extended interview with perhaps the most
well-known advocate against elder financial abuse: Mickey Rooney. The 91-year
old film star testified before Congress last year while detailing abuse that he
suffered at the hands of a family member. His purpose in appearing in the film
is to dispel the myth that this sort of exploitation occurs only to those who
live alone or have few close friends and family members. In fact the documentary
tagline is: "If it can happen to Mickey Rooney, it can happen to anybody."
The filmmaker was motivated to take on the project after watching her
father fall victim to abuse. She explains how her father was in a
nursing home, when mysteriously, a stranger entered the facility and claimed to
be his son. The senior had just lost his wife and was suffering from severe
Alzheimer's at the time. The filmmaker states that her father "would have signed
the Magna Carta" if it was placed in front of him at that point in his life.
The scammer used his lie about being a relative to acquire sensitive
financial information and exploit the ailing senior. The man also acquired a
Power of Attorney over the senior, making it incredibly difficult for the family
to unravel the problem down the road. It ultimately took two years before the
woman finally learned of the depth of the exploitation. Her advice: "Set it up so you don't become a victim...know the laws against
elder abuse."
Since the Supreme Court upheld the Affordable Car Act,
The Elder Justice Act contained in it can be implemented. It aims to combat financial, physical, and mental crimes and abuse
committed against the elderly. Some help may also be coming in the form of federal legislation. New York
Senator Chuck Schumer, for example, is fighting for stepped up federal laws
requiring more mandatory reporting of suspicions of elder mistreatment. While
these new rules may help, by no means do they offer clear avenues to eliminate
all mistreatment.
Planning and oversight by the family are crucial preventative steps. Obviously having elder law
attorneys and other advocates in the mix is one way to ensure abusers aren't
able to obtain legal documents and wreak havoc on the life
of a vulnerable senior who may not fully understand the situation. Overall, it's best to have comprehensive
oversight and proper preparation before disability or cognitive vulnerability
sets in.
Practicing Exclusively Estate Planning, Probate, Medicaid Planning, and Estate Administration.
Tuesday, July 17, 2012
Thursday, July 12, 2012
Losing the Family Home Over a $400 Tax Bill
Senior care advocates repeatedly remind families that oversight is needed in
some cases to ensure seniors do not fall victim to financial exploitation. Beyond protecting against scammers and hucksters, many seniors are
facing a new financial crisis that is not rooted in illegal misconduct. When on
a fixed income and struggling with confusing money issues, some seniors might
face incredibly severe financial penalties for falling behind on certain bills
or taxes. CNN Money reported this week on a growing number of individuals who are
losing their homes because they owe relatively small sums. A report from the
National Consumer Law Center (NCLC) detailed how some states have outdated laws that
allow states to sell tax liens on delinquent properties. This means
that instead of the government having a lien on a piece of property that owed
back taxes or bills for services like water and gas, private investors own the
lien. The investor then collects interests on the overdue bill or, in some
cases, forecloses on the home. Some states allow investors to charge
staggeringly high interest rates, from 15% to 50%.
Seniors are particularly vulnerable to falling behind in this way, either because of challenges of being on a fixed income or confusion with the bill paying process. The NCLC report details one case of an 81-year old woman who lost the home she lived in for 40 years because she owed $474 on a sewer bill. The NCLC report noted that seniors with cognitive diseases, like dementia and Alzheimer's are prone to fall victim to this situation. It is very confusing to follow the changing financial arrangements. The seniors are usually notified of the situation in legalese that many do not understand. As a result, they do nothing, rack up interest debt, eventually default, and often lose their home. The report elaborated that seniors without family members or who have not visited with elder law attorneys and other professionals were more likely to be hurt by this situation. In one case, an elderly woman who lived alone without family fell back $5,000 on taxes. Eventually, she lost her home and lost about $150,000 in equity that she had accumulated.
Advocates are working to change laws so that interest rates are lowered and adequate warnings are provided to homeowners. It remains unclear if those efforts will be successful, and so putting preventative measures in place now is prudent for local seniors to avoid this situation.
Seniors are particularly vulnerable to falling behind in this way, either because of challenges of being on a fixed income or confusion with the bill paying process. The NCLC report details one case of an 81-year old woman who lost the home she lived in for 40 years because she owed $474 on a sewer bill. The NCLC report noted that seniors with cognitive diseases, like dementia and Alzheimer's are prone to fall victim to this situation. It is very confusing to follow the changing financial arrangements. The seniors are usually notified of the situation in legalese that many do not understand. As a result, they do nothing, rack up interest debt, eventually default, and often lose their home. The report elaborated that seniors without family members or who have not visited with elder law attorneys and other professionals were more likely to be hurt by this situation. In one case, an elderly woman who lived alone without family fell back $5,000 on taxes. Eventually, she lost her home and lost about $150,000 in equity that she had accumulated.
Advocates are working to change laws so that interest rates are lowered and adequate warnings are provided to homeowners. It remains unclear if those efforts will be successful, and so putting preventative measures in place now is prudent for local seniors to avoid this situation.
Monday, July 9, 2012
How Does the Affordable Care Act Affect Taxes and Estate Planning?
No legal news item last week was bigger than the U.S. Supreme Court's
decision to uphold virtually the entirety of the Affordable Care Act. In a move that surprised many observers, in a 5-4 decision the
Court deemed the controversial "individual mandate" portion of the measure
constitutional on grounds that it constituted a tax. While the court held that
the Congress could not pass the law pursuant to its power to regulate interstate
commerce, it did find it a permissible use of the legislature's taxing power.
Now that the matter is reasonably settled, local residents may be wondering how the law affects their estate planning, if at all. A recent Smart Money story talked about some of these issues, explaining how certain tax matters will indeed change in the upcoming year as a result of the decision. A few select rates will change next year. For example, an extra .9% Medicare tax increase will start for various individuals making over $200,000 or $250,000. In addition, some investment income (long-term capital gains and dividends) may face a 3.8% "Medicare contribution tax." This is in addition to the rising rates if the "Bush tax cuts" expire without renewal.
Starting in 2013, a cap will be added on contributions to a healthcare "flexible spending account" (FSA) plan. Right now there is no cap, so an unlimited amount of money can be contributed to the plan which is then subtracted from taxable income. The money can be used to reimburse qualified medical expenses. Starting next year, contributions to those plans will be capped at $2,500. Similarly, itemized deductions for medical expenses will now apply only to expenses that exceed 10% of annual gross income (up from the current 7.5%).
However, it is important to keep these tax issues in perspective, because they represent just a part of the bill. The overall goal is to provide comprehensive health insurance for more Americans so that overall expenditures go down while quality of care goes up, but the long-term effect of these sweeping changes will not be fully fleshed out for years to come. While the high-profile and controversial nature of the law may suggest that many things will change for all residents once it is fully in effect, the truth may be a bit less dramatic for many local families.
Now that the matter is reasonably settled, local residents may be wondering how the law affects their estate planning, if at all. A recent Smart Money story talked about some of these issues, explaining how certain tax matters will indeed change in the upcoming year as a result of the decision. A few select rates will change next year. For example, an extra .9% Medicare tax increase will start for various individuals making over $200,000 or $250,000. In addition, some investment income (long-term capital gains and dividends) may face a 3.8% "Medicare contribution tax." This is in addition to the rising rates if the "Bush tax cuts" expire without renewal.
Starting in 2013, a cap will be added on contributions to a healthcare "flexible spending account" (FSA) plan. Right now there is no cap, so an unlimited amount of money can be contributed to the plan which is then subtracted from taxable income. The money can be used to reimburse qualified medical expenses. Starting next year, contributions to those plans will be capped at $2,500. Similarly, itemized deductions for medical expenses will now apply only to expenses that exceed 10% of annual gross income (up from the current 7.5%).
However, it is important to keep these tax issues in perspective, because they represent just a part of the bill. The overall goal is to provide comprehensive health insurance for more Americans so that overall expenditures go down while quality of care goes up, but the long-term effect of these sweeping changes will not be fully fleshed out for years to come. While the high-profile and controversial nature of the law may suggest that many things will change for all residents once it is fully in effect, the truth may be a bit less dramatic for many local families.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)